Montecristo Open Master

Montecristo Open Master

Origin : CubaMontecristo
Format : Robusto
Size : 5 x 50
Ring : 50
Price : $10+ each
More info about purchasing Montecristo cigars...

Montecristo Open finally hit the shelves of my local B&M and, of course, I had to give them a try. Unfortunately the Regatas weren't available yet so I took a couple of Masters (classic 5x50 robustos). At well over $10 each in the B&M, it was a costly purchase and, although I wasn't expecting a flavor bomb, I was hoping for a pleasant smoking experience.

Appearance : ★★★★½
The looks are real good, I have to admit that. Apart from a few water spots on the wrapper, this is a gorgeous cigar. It exhales a very strong tobacco smell, one of the most intense I have ever experienced on a Cuban cigar.

Montecristo Open Master

Construction : ★★★☆☆
This is where it starts. I understand that the cigar is young and I smoked it straight out of the box, but the Open line is supposed to attract young smokers, who do not have any knowledge in storing cigars and purchase them to smoke an hour later sitting in a café. Although the ash held very well, the burn line was quite bad. I don't even remember how many times I had to correct it. Fortunately, the draw was flawless.
Flavor : ★★★½☆
Despite a very spicy pre-draw, there is no spice kick in the beginning. The smoke is medium-bodied and quite round. The Open Master immediately deploys solid woody flavors which will be dominating until the last pulls. As secondary notes, one can detect herbaceous flavors in the first third along with some coffee and bitter spice in the last two thirds. There is no real evolution in this cigar, it is woody and medium-bodied throughout the smoke.

Value : ★★☆☆☆
Considerably more expensive than the Petit Edmundo, this cigar provides a particularly low price/quality ratio based on this first experience.

Overall Rating : ★★★☆☆
If not for the construction and the inflated price, I could say that the Montecristo Open Master was a decent smoke for beginners. Good-looking, medium-bodied and accessible flavor-wise, it has everything to be a success. However, if you have some experience with Cuban cigars, I do not see this line as a good addition to your humidor.

If you enjoyed this post, please share it with your friends on social media! Thanks!
Loved this post? Subscribe to future updates and get a chance to win premium cigars!

Click here for more details.

13 Comments on “Montecristo Open Master”

  1. Thanks mate, you confirmed my suspicions. Will defo avoid.

  2. ehibbert says:

    You are being kind. The are actually terrible!

  3. Soundwave says:

    I’ve had the Open Eagle & thought it was quite good, no burn issues. I didn’t have any expectations goin in either. Instead of chocolate-spice I got chocolate-creamm which I suppose is more palatable for the newb. I’ll let the price drop a bit before purchasing any also, though I’d love to get some more…

  4. I remember when the Edmundo was first introduced that it was panned pretty thoroughly. Since then the reviews have gotten much better. Let’s hope the same thing happens with the Open.

  5. Thanks for the review. Unfortunate info as I know they hyped these up quite a lot.

  6. Jobbastic says:

    Hmmz.. Just bought 2 good looking open masters and planning of smoking it tonight at the birthday of my best friend. Wrong decision is see now! Better first read your reviews before going to my local tabaccoshop! Strange thing is, the guy of the tabaccoshop(who i have been knowing for 4 years now) even recomended this one… !?

  7. Well, perhaps you will enjoy it – although I must say I doubt so. My local salesman told me he was disgusted by the cigar.

  8. I tried the MC open eagle and really enjoed it. Lit well, burned even and draw was effordless. I tried a Regatta today, very disappointing. Hard to light and burn was uneven, hard draw with a stale tasted. Ring size was too small for this cigar, I recommend the eagle or the master.

  9. I have tried the opens in Junior, Regatta & Master releases. All have been dissapointing. I think this is a massive failure by montecristo. I have read what they tried to do here but I think they will just turn new smokers off. My two cents. :-)

  10. Have to agree with the negatives here – this is not a cigar for afficionados or beginners. This is for movie prop providers. The draw and smoke levels are fine as is the burn correction but it lacks flavour and charisma. As an introduction to Montecristo? Forget it – this is clearly designed to discourage smoking. Massive Montecristo failure. Anyone who knows cigars should avoid and no salesperson should recommend for anyone, beginner or otherwise. These are the blow-back Airsoft, or blank firing replicas of cigars.

  11. Dee Dee Ramone says:

    I was browsing through the Cigar Reviews section of the CA magazine where they reviewed this particular cigar. They gave it a 91 rating which I find really baffling.

    . I’ve bought a 3-pack of this smoke at the Malaysian airport duty, smoked it and regretted not picking up the Edmundo instead (same price) as they smoked terribly. Tight draw on all 3. Tasted bland bordering shit to me. The burn wave was so wavy that I could surf on the damn thing!

    This begs me the question; is there something wrong with my taste palate or they should review the panel of cigar testers at CA?

  12. Dee Dee Ramone says:

    Oh it’s the August 2013 issue of CA by the way

  13. Most of the Malaysian airport cigars r fakes, so r most D/F cubans or non Cuban,

Leave your mini review or comment...