21 responses

  1. ricky
    March 15, 2011

    You must be geting paid or your knolage of cigars is at best mediocre.to describe the short perfecto as simple,one dimentional is a clear sing of lack of knolage.do us cigars smokers a favor and stop printing your opinion ,my friend is embarasing to the cigar family.have a nice day

    Reply

  2. Aaron
    March 15, 2011

    I am sorry you feel that way Ricky. But I stand by my review. If the construction wasn’t so poor I believe the complexities could have appeared. I have smoked several Davidoffs in the past and they all have performed very well and didn’t have construction flaws, but this was not the case with this vital. Upon reading other review sites, I am not the only one that had problems with the construction of the short perfecto. But in the future I would much rather smoke Avos and Paul Garmirians (which are other Henke Kelner involved projects) than Davidoffs.

    Reply

  3. chekk12
    March 15, 2011

    Is this comment a joke?If it is its funny.If its not it is very sad.

    Reply

  4. tpetzold
    March 16, 2011

    I liked the review. I am sure you know what you are tlking about. However, I say give another a try. There can be one bad one in every box. Davidoff is usually a very good cigar, as you pointed out, so why not? Keep it up, you kept me from buying some bummer cigars and kept me from overreaching on some more expensive ones. Thanks!

    Reply

  5. Aaron
    March 16, 2011

    tpetzold,

    I agree with you that I should give this one another whirl. I probably will, since I have access to all the Davidoffs at the B&M’s in Austin. I smoke so many different smokes that I don’t think it will be that soon that I return to this one. But I promise I will eventually try this one again.

    Reply

  6. tpetzold
    March 16, 2011

    Well, just in case…feel free to send me any extras!

    Reply

  7. John
    March 16, 2011

    Ricky, Please do us cigars smokers a favor and learn penmanship. You’re embarrassing yourself.

    Reply

  8. Mormegil
    March 17, 2011

    Ricky, you may want to stop posting. Your lack of literacy is an embarrassment to anyone above a 2nd grade education. And that’s being generous.
    Don’t pay any attention to him, Aaron. Thanks for the review and suggestion to avoid this one.

    Reply

  9. Jmorena
    March 17, 2011

    $13 should buy you a very good cigar, Cuban or non Cuban. The risk is selling them at this price point. One bad experience = never trying another. Hey Ricky, I saw these same cigars online for only $300 a box! Jump on it, also comes with a dictionary!

    Reply

  10. Chance Wayne
    March 18, 2011

    I’ll have to agree with Ricky on this one. Whilst he may not be the best typist, his point is valid. I’ve smoked many Davidoff and never had a bad one. The problems stated in this “review” can easily be attributed to how this cigar was stored, when it was smoked, where it was smoked etc. I think instead of people trying to make witty comments they should go out and buy one of these cigars and give it a try for themselves. I never trust and take a reviewer seriously after they smoke only one cigar and review it.

    Reply

  11. Danny Principe
    March 20, 2011

    I can’t say that I agree with this review. While not my favorite cigar, I have found that far more often than not, these deliver on construction. I think you should give them another chance. There is a reason that most people make it a point not to make a final judgement based on one cigar. No matter how consistent the company, this is still a product that is made entirely by hand, and there will always be the occasional dud.

    Reply

  12. ROTHNH
    March 20, 2011

    Thanks for the honest, straightforward review, Aaron. While even super premium cigars are hand made products, it is unacceptable and extremely disappointing to have an experience like this one/ There’s no excuse for it. You are right in suggesting the shape may be the problem as it takes top-notch (level 7) torcedors to roll such a figurado and not that difficult to screw it up. Reminds my of the 5-pack of Cabaiguan Belicoso Fino cigars I had a few years ago, rested under optional conditions for six months and only one of the five cigars exhibited the quality of a $10 cigar — the other four had one or more issues such as bad burn, wrapper splitting, wrapper disintegration (unrolling) and draw issues.

    Reply

  13. Johnson
    March 24, 2011

    @ricky

    Well, what oh what to say about you my little and obviously very uneducated friend. Let me give you a piece of advice and try and read this slowly so you take it all in. If you are going to come on a site that posts reviews (opinions) and slam someone for their opinion try to use proper grammar, punctuation and spelling. I know a 3rd grader with better punctuation. You are sad my little friend. Go play in the traffic.

    Reply

  14. radu
    August 12, 2011

    As Danny Principe and others have pointed out, it’s highly irresponsible to write a review after a single sample has been analysed.
    While I respect anyone’s opinion on the flavour, aroma and strength of a cigar (such things being highly subjective it’s easy to disagree on them), it is well known that construction is a statistical issue, and when one criticizes so strongly flawed construction based on a sample count of one (1), it only makes them look unprofessional and irrelevant in their haste.

    Please, do yourself and your readers a favour and take the review down, or preface it with a note clearly indicating that one does not judge a cigar based on a flawed sample, that responsible reviewing needs to be statistically relevant, etc. and the review that follows does not meet these criteria.
    I suggest you read Min Ron Nee’s cigar encyclopaedia for a needed cure of principles to your approach.
    Don’t take offence at my message, please – its harshness only matches the gravity of your offence.

    Regards, Radu

    Reply

  15. Aaron
    August 12, 2011

    Thanks Radu for your comments. Since this review, I have not repeated the single cigar review. I know it is not fair and I have cured that. In all fairness, I returned to review the Davidoff Special series and will be posting another review soon on the Special R. Though it was slightly better, the results were mediocre at best. But I promise I will not review another cigar on just one stick again.

    Reply

  16. radu
    August 12, 2011

    That’s really great to hear. Again, sorry for being harsh, I don’t like it myself reading that, but it just got to me :)

    I had a Special R recently and it was a dud: 1/3rd of the circumference was not burning almost at all, which made it almost un-smokable and I had to leave it before it burned the first quarter.
    To their credit, when I’ve told this to one of the clerks at the Davidoff shop, they’ve asked me that in the future I keep these and return them for exchange or refund.
    For what it’s worth, the little parts that I did get to smoke though were not as enjoyable as the perfecto, which, in my opinion, has a very pleasant grassy and hay, slight sweet, slightly bitter taste that rounds off nicely as it develops, adding a bit of spice and strength.

    Reply

  17. porchfly80
    November 23, 2012

    I smoked one of these for the first time on Thanksgiving. I must say I did find a tight and difficult smoke the first 5 minutes but from then on it was a smooth and quite balanced cigar. From a construction standpoint mine was perfect (I purchased it @ Davidoff on Madison). I do agree $13 there are better cigars out there no mater what your taste. But I like the cigar over all and it’s size/smoke time was perfect considering I had to also attend to a turkey. For those of you arguing with reviews take a chill pill it is a review and meant to be an opinion. I have personally found most reviews I have read about cigars very helpful and thank those of you who take time out to educate others.

    Reply

  18. Bruce
    February 18, 2013

    I have to say, I’m smoking one now and it’s incredible. The draw is almost perfect, maybe a little loose, but the burn was slightly uneven at the beginning (nothing a little saliva on the thumb didn’t fix). This flavor is truly unique as I am usually a maduro fanatic. I will probably buy again, it’s worth trying.

    Reply

  19. Bruce
    February 18, 2013

    Anyone else find a cream taste? Like vanilla half and half meets hay in the second third?

    Reply

  20. raymond
    February 10, 2015

    I smoked a perfecto 2 weeks ago.Jan.31.2015.four years makes a heck of a difference.one light cigar,the ash held on to my surprise for 3\4 length.great flavor, awesome draw,great smoke.5 star smoke without a doubt.

    Reply

  21. Jeff
    March 17, 2015

    I just smoked one of these. I didn’t have any of the construction or burning out out issues mentioned in the review however I can attest to the harshness at the start and the end of the cigar. I bought two and I’m gonna let one age for a couple of years and hopefully can even it out a bit.

    The middle part of the cigar was fairly enjoyable in terms of taste. A lot of earthy tones, which is not my favorite flavour profile personally but made for a nice change from the Cuban sticks I tend to gravitate towards.

    Smoke consistency was nice and creamy throughout and the ash behaved for me all the way through.

    I enjoy the look of the cigar and would rate it a 3 out of 5 personally.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top
mobile desktop